Environmental and energy innovation advocates are recommending that the Department of Energy (DOE) significantly restructure in order to better support new energy technologies, including shifting nuclear weapons and cleanup responsibilities to EPA and other agencies and reorganizing its offices based on energy uses rather than sources.
The April 3 report, authored by the Clean Air Task Force and the Energy Innovation Reform Project, finds that DOE “continues to underperform against expectations” despite billions in stimulus law funding, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) and other efforts and programs to improve the department's performance.
“[W]e do believe that government can play a vital role in catalyzing technological innovation in the future, as it has in the past. The key to progress, and the overarching spirit of our recommendations, is to ensure that the goals and technical milestones of government-assisted energy research and development are established not by elected officials and political appointees but by scientists and engineers working in collaboration with private-sector energy technology providers,” the report states.
The report was issued days before Ernest Moniz, the Obama administration's nominee to lead DOE, appeared before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee for his confirmation hearing, where he did not address calls for wholesale reform but promised a series of changes to how the department is managed. For example, he told Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), who asked about ways to advance a smart grid, that he wanted to work differently with energy laboratory directors “so that they are engaged more in the strategic decisions about where we all go together.”
Discussion of possible reforms could also occur in the context of a looming debate over DOE's fiscal year 2014 budget, which the Obama administration unveiled April 10. The Senate energy committee is slated to hold a hearing on DOE's budget April 18, but an agenda for the hearing has not yet been released.
The report recommends that DOE take a number of steps to better focus their efforts to advance energy technologies, including moving nuclear weapons programs to the Department of Defense and environmental cleanup efforts to EPA or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. “DOE uses contractors to manage and conduct cleanup activities. EPA or the Army Corps can easily do the same,” the report says, adding that the Army Corps “has experience performing environmental remediation, including projects involving radioactive contamination.”
If EPA were to become responsible for cleanups, the report notes that “[EPA] might gain a richer, first-hand perspective on the costs and benefits of its own regulations, leading to more practical, realistic approaches to regulating environmental cleanup. Some may argue that EPA should not be allowed to regulate itself in these projects. There are multiple checks and balances, however, to protect against the danger of an unaccountable EPA. In addition to congressional and presidential oversight, affected States and other parties will retain access to judicial review and remedy should a situation arise where EPA’s applications of its rules for its own cleanups are less rigorous than what it requires for others.”
The report also suggests that DOE restructure its offices, arguing that its current setup “stovepipes” applied energy programs by technology and thereby promotes “factionalism rather than focusing on innovation that meets America’s energy needs.” Instead, DOE should consolidate its office and focus more on “energy end use rather than primary energy source," creating offices of power and grid technologies, transportation and fuel technologies and advanced energy efficiency technologies.
The outlook for implementing the recommendations remains murky, with the groups acknowledging that any reform efforts could span several administrations. But DOE has already taken some steps toward eliminating stove-pipping in its energy program, with DOE officials recently touting a plan to create a new transportation office within its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Department officials have said the move will help better coordinate and prioritize research and development programs for biofuels, electric vehicles and other advanced technologies.
Elsewhere in the report, the groups recommend that DOE should adopt new methods for supporting “first-of-a-kind” commercial demonstration projects like the carbon capture and sequestration project FutureGen 2.0, finding that “ DOE has proven itself to be virtually incapable of executing” such projects. And the report faults DOE's "micromanagement" of its national labs, saying the department “should evaluate the labs on their progress in overcoming technology challenges and other strategic outcomes, ending its micromanagement."