Login

Forgot password?
Sign up today and your first download is free.
REGISTER

Federal Facilities

Push For PFCs Assessment In New Jersey Could Spur Broader Actions

Environmentalists are asking a federal health agency to assess public health impacts from a perfluorocarbon (PFC) contaminating southern New Jersey drinking water wells, an effort that could put pressure on EPA and other regulators to increase their attention to PFCs -- a currently unregulated class of chemicals that studies are finding are persistent and toxic, sources who follow the issue say.

1152 words

168893

Backing Industry, Reviewers Urge EPA To Revise TSCA Assessment Of TCE

Several panelists reviewing EPA's draft risk assessment of trichloroethylene (TCE) are urging the agency to overhaul the document with additional exposure data, backing industry claims that the first such assessment in the agency's novel effort to evaluate and possibly regulate chemicals is inadequate for regulatory purposes.

1325 words

168871

EPA Grants Industry Request To Extend EtO Assessment Comment Deadline

EPA is extending the public comment period on its recently released draft assessment of the risks that ethylene oxide (EtO) poses to human health, following requests from industry groups citing their need for more time to review research the agency cited in its assessment.

1120 words

168867

EPA-DHS Data Conflict Cited In Call For Facility Security Program Changes

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), ranking member on the energy committee, is citing a conflict between EPA and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) data on the security of a gas storage facility in his district to highlight what he says are broader problems with DHS' security program that warrant "significant changes" to the policy.

836 words

168857

California Floats Novel Cr6 Standard But Cost Fears Drive Weak Limit

California regulators have proposed a first-in-the-nation drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium (Cr6), the widespread toxic metal, but the proposal is expected to be strongly opposed by environmentalists, who are disappointed that cost concerns forced officials to propose a limit significantly weaker than the health goal officials issued in 2011.

1036 words

168848

EPA Tightens Cancer Listing, Crafts Novel Dermal Risk Estimate For BaP

EPA's draft Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), an assessment that EPA will use as a benchmark to determine the relative carcinogenic potential of a host of other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), strengthens the agency's cancer classification for the petrochemical substance and includes a novel dermal cancer risk estimate.

878 words

168845

States Seek FY14 Funding Boost For DOE Nuclear Cleanups

State environmental agencies are urging Congress to boost funding for the Department of Energy's (DOE) nuclear cleanup budget in fiscal year 2014, warning the cleanup program will face "debilitating problems" if lawmakers continue to cut funding as proposed in pending House and Senate appropriations bills for DOE's FY14 budget.

In an Aug. 6 letter to key lawmakers on the House and Senate appropriations committee and defense authorization committees, the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) urges the lawmakers to enact a total DOE cleanup budget of $5.9 billion -- a level significantly higher than either the House or Senate has proposed for fiscal year 2014 and higher than DOE's FY14 budget request.

The Senate has proposed funding the cleanup program at $5.38 billion for FY14, while the House proposes to fund them at $5.25 billion. ECOS says it is unclear whether sequestration would further reduce those amounts to $4.96 billion for the Senate and $4.83 billion for the House.

DOE has requested approximately $5.53 billion for FY14. "But even at this figure, we worry that DOE would not be able to successfully perform cleanup work to levels necessary for meeting its obligations to state governments on schedule per cleanup agreements," ECOS says.

"We believe that Congress should fully fund DOE's FY2014 budget request, and appropriate above this request to $5.90B (or as close as possible) so these critical cleanup operations can continue uninterrupted, and states can conduct the oversight necessary to ensure the work is performed to standard," says the letter signed by the heads of environmental departments in states with DOE contaminated sites.

The states say they understand that Congress is working to reduce federal spending and there are a lot of different interests competing for increasingly limited funds. But the program has already faced declining budgets in recent years, and the states say this is harming the ability to meet cleanup goals, is causing the forced layoffs of state oversight workers and could lead to more contractor layoffs.

In FY10, Congress appropriated $5.9 billion to fund the cleanup of hazardous and radiological wastes at U.S. nuclear weapons complex sites. This funding enabled DOE to successfully perform most of its cleanup activities on schedule as required by legally-binding state-federal cleanup agreements, ECOS says.

In FY12, Congress reduced DOE's cleanup funding to $5.23 billion, which resulted in missed legally-binding cleanup milestones. Congress slightly increased funding to $5.27 in FY13 under an adjusted continuing resolution, however due to sequestration, the cleanup budget was ultimately funded at $4.85 billion.

"These cuts have resulted in tremendous challenges for the nuclear cleanup and oversight programs," ECOS says. "Hundreds of private cleanup contractors have been laid off; sampling of some contaminated groundwater plumes has had to occur less frequently; and DOE is missing a number of important milestones."

The states say they are very concerned that continuing lower budget appropriations will cause the program "debilitating problems," including the indefinite delay of plans to start pump-and-treat systems to remediate some contaminated groundwater.

Additional cuts could further curtain the frequency of contamination sampling and jeopardize the states' ability to provide quality assurance of DOE cleanup activities, ECOS says.

The states also ask Congress to provide them with notice as soon as possible when there are changes to DOE funding. "We request that more advanced notice be provided to states regarding the possible impacts of any future funding cuts, and we wish for states to be provided ample opportunities for consulting with DOE regarding state cleanup priorities during this era of restricted budgets," ECOS says.

612 words

168645

EPA Faces DOD Push For Weaker Risk Levels As It Begins RDX Analysis

As EPA relaunches its reassessment of the risks of royal demolition explosive (RDX), a widely used munitions' component, the agency is facing pressure from the Defense Department (DOD) to weaken its current toxicity levels after DOD research called for EPA to soften current risk values and a federal health agency incorporated the research into its analysis.

1476 words

168834

Industry Split Over Reintroduced Electronics Recycling Export Ban Bill

Electronics recyclers and the broader scrap recycling industry are split over whether to support a recently reintroduced House bill that would bar certain used electronics from being shipped to developing countries, and would increase EPA's authority to regulate electronic waste (e-waste).

1158 words

168823

EPA IG Cancels Study Of Delayed Superfund NPL Listings

EPA's Inspector General (IG) has decided to drop a study it initiated earlier this year to uncover why EPA has a backlog of sites proposed to Superfund's National Priorities List (NPL), the list of the worst contaminated sites in the country, but has never moved forward on them or removed them from the proposed list.

In a recent cancellation memo to the agency's enforcement and waste chiefs, the IG says it is canceling the project after conducting preliminary research.

The IG cites two reasons for this decision: first, that EPA has no requirement to finalize proposed sites on the NPL, and second, that a sampling of sites revealed the agency was pursuing alternative cleanup approaches at these sites. "As a result, we have decided to close this assignment."

The IG's Office of Program Evaluation notified the EPA enforcement and waste chiefs April 4 of its plan to launch the study, noting the effort is part of the IG's fiscal year 2013 annual plan.

In a notification to these offices, the IG said its "preliminary research objective is to determine why some Superfund sites that have been proposed for NPL listing have remained in the proposed status for many years without being finalized on the NPL or removed from the proposed NPL list."

EPA could benefit from this evaluation by taking up opportunities to reallocate resources to ensure environmental and human health protection at the highest priority Superfund sites, the April 4 memo said.

 

271 words

25320

Pages